Dworkins Belief Of Preferential Treatment :: essays research papers

Dworkins Belief of Preferential Treatment     For many years, preferential word has been used to try to make upfor past wrong-doings to minorities. T here birth been many cases tried overracial discrimination, with verdicts of both innocent and guilty. RonaldDworkin attempts to compete that preferential give-and-take is socially useful and atthe same cartridge holder does not violate peoples rights. This is wrong for many reasonshere I shall bedeck how preferential treatment hinders racial equality,violates peoples rights, and can lead to a overthrow opinion toward a particularrace.     Dworkin believes that continuing preferential treatment give decreaseracial consciousness and the importance of race. This is the total opposite ofwhat genuinely happens. If a person were to consider Americas past, as an example,he would see how racially diverse people were. Now look around. Just walk of lifecrosswise any given ara, groups of people of the same race are seen walkingtogether. Most people do not notice this, but precise rarely are groups ofethnically diverse people seen. Although there are no longer any laws statingthat there must be a separation between different races, people still practiceit unconsciously. Dworkin states that the long-term goal of preferentialtreatment "is to reduce the degree to which American company is overall aracially conscious society (294)." Preferential treatment does nothing of thesort. It was used widely in the past and still exists in some areas today. Ithas not reduced racial consciousness, but increased it by making people thinkmore virtually how many spaces are reserved for their particular race. Instead,people should think of what their chances are of getting something on account oftheir personal knowledge over someone elses, not nonetheless considering their race asa factor. This is evident in a blacks acid of view of getting into themedical work of the Universi ty of California at Davis. cardinal places are setaside just for blacks and other minorities, no theme how low their test scoresare. That way, minorities dont even have to worry about competing with whitesfor a position. This does not, in any way, reduce racial consciousness bysetting two tracks for admission to medical school, one for the minorities, andone for the majority.     Mr. Dworkin supports the root that preferential treatment does notviolate peoples rights. His argument is weak here because he attempts to provethis by saying that if two things do not violate peoples rights, then neitherdoes a third. The two things that supposedly do not violate rights are thedenial of someone to medical school because of their age and because their test